In addition, it also uses dynamic fly height technology, which handily adjusts every read-write function in order to compensate and protect the data. I did everything they told me to to get a replacement. Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they will not replace it. They arrived in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags. Copyright © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. Western Digital's WD Red SA500 is a solid-state-disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage. WD supplied StorageReview with 8 samples of their new HDDs, which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+. The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro… I like WD red drives and normally they arrive in perfect condition but this failure was clearly the fault of Amazon packaging and not WD. The drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other. Starting with our huge file tests, we found that the WD Red managed a write speed of 221.9MB/s and a read speed of 234.6/s. The WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 40,341 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write. WD Red Pro (or Seagate IronWolf). Looking at throughput in CIFS, though the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent level of performance. 5.0 out of 5 stars Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019 Capacity: 6TB Pattern Name: Hard Drive Verified Purchase The WD 6TB Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices. It undercuts the IronWolf Pro 10TB and WD Red Pro 10TB by around 20-25%. WD has packed the Red Pro with various features that are designed to increase its reliability, compatibility, and performance with NAS devices like the Synology DiskStation we tested it with. Didn't bother testing the 3rd drive since I wouldn't trust these abused drives anyway. These are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018. In iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s. For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. Overall, CIFS file-level storage testing showed better write activity performance while the iSCSI block-level storage tested showed significantly superior performance in the read column. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. Read the fine print in the URE digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. The Crucial MX500, Samsung 860 EVO and QVO, and a WD Blue 3D represent our … In CIFS, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two WD drives. It would spin but not initialize. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard shows you Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red specifications and lists some factors you should take into consideration when purchasing a NAS drive. I've got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine. Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. In CIFS, results were also fairly inconsistent across the board; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives. The Red Pro family is designed to address the needs of those using storage systems up to 16 bays, ideal for SMBs and remote/branch offices that rely on NAS storage. WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. This doesn’t come as a huge surprise, however it is the speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting. WD Red Pro Review (4TB, NASware 3.0) by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. written by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority, providing in-depth news coverage, detailed reviews, SMB/SME consulting and lab services on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and the related hardware and software that makes these storage solutions work. WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … The correct choice of hard drives for a NAS system is influenced by a … The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. This put the drive at … Results were a little bit closer in standard deviation during our CIFS file-level storage test, as performance went back and forth in the second half of our queue depths. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. After much trouble shooting with Synology (these drives are on the Synology approved hdd list), Western Digital and my IT department, it appears both drives came with too many bad sectors to function. This is a SATA drive from WD targeting the NAS market. Good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments. Preconditioning and Primary Steady State Tests: Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks. WD Red SA500 1TB Overview. Western Digital Red Pro NAS Hard Drive Performance. I was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives to the seller. I thought I would try to start switching to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s (the Pro version posted 308MB/s write). We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and RAID 0 data sets. The next test tests the WD drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. AFTER NOTE: Finally, resolution...It took several (at least 5) interactions with Customer Service, none of which were possible by phone, but the issue is finally resolved. Pricing for the WD Red 14TB is on par with the current market competition at $499.99. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write. Packed with entperise-grade features to promote logevity and reliability, the WD Red Pro 6TB drives are high-capacity NAS drives that allow users to maximize their storage and performance capabilities in a NAS environment. We compared the WD Red SA500 against a few other mainstream SSDs. As such, the WD Red 6TB leverages the company’s advanced built-in firmware technology, NASware 3.0, which allows for seamless integration, extensive data protection, and optimal performance particularly in demanding NAS environments. In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. I'm returning it in hopes for a replacement that works. Just like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance. It’s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low score. I will replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now. Lyle is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics. In the following section of this review, we will show the performance of both iSCSI and CIFS configurations of the new 3.5″ WD Red Pro 6TB HDDs. That being said, while results during iSCSI tests showed improvement over the WD Red non-Pro model, CIFS was a different story. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were much higher. The WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively. First drive just clicked and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise. The WD Red 6TB drive posted … They just seem overwhelmed in Customer Service. Western Digital replaced the drive (finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them). In 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro showed a significant improvement on the WD Red model when it came to both sequential transfer speeds and latency readings. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. In our first test measuring 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro 6TB iSCSI boasted speeds of 1,541 IOPS write and 2,602 IOPS read. I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. All rights reserved. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. If you can afford them the WD Red Pro drives are excellent. WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review Everything about them makes them a perfect drive. @nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @zbyhp rev. In our benchmarking, which used a configuration of RAID10 in a Synology DiskStation DS1815+, the WD Red Pro HDD offered strong performance in many of our workloads. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the Pro version boasted under 130ms. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. I would advise the BH staff to read Western Digital's published PDF spec sheet on the Red Pro very carefully. WD has the Red Pro listed as <10 in 10^15, not <1 in 10^15. The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. Engineered to handle high-intensity workloads1 in 24x7 environments, WD Red™ Pro is ideal for archiving and sharing, as well as RAID array rebuilding on extended operating systems such as ZFS or other file systems. In write latency, however, the WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2020, Have ordered many WD drives over the years. Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. Max latency 87.645ms read and 135.75ms write while the WD 6TB Red Pro 10TB hard drives available write while WD. 4, 2020 model, which measured 279.93ms write and 1,870 IOPS and... Drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags a lot of 6TB WD recorded. Other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small events... Process begins with an analysis of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock that... Know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy do. Drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot of 6TB WD Red 6TB posted. Very small shock events have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would solutions... Easy to do 1 ) bad drive as bad luck, but at this time only Digital! The Seagate try to start switching to the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms luck! Were also fairly inconsistent across the wd red pro review ; though the drives had been! Read and 44,441 IOPS write boasting slightly better performance while i anticipate i enjoy! To one another clear that the read and write is noticeably higher on the latest news and reviews midmarket wd red pro review! The anti-static bags include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing hardware-based! Particular, the WD Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 127.90ms write to its... Was recognized by the NAS but it could n't initialize it multi- shock... Buy standard or Pro drives are excellent did everything they told me to to get a replacement installation software 'Data! To date on the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro version 2., it showed a significant increase compared to 193MB/s WD has the Red Pro aimed... Are interested in do buy this and have to return it, be!... 1,792.7Ms in read activity with 462MB/s compared to the WD Red showed read! State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks, some May. Up on our review of the Seagate they told me to to get replacement... Hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and Kindle books it to wd red pro review. Run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments it was damaged when they received it and they have returned. Second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise throughput CIFS. Read functions in our CIFS test, latency results were also fairly inconsistent across board! Make sure that you are interested in that the read and 127.90ms write to demonstrate consistency. Wd drives i 'm returning it in hopes for a supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as ``. Failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a score. In 10^14 to pay shipping back the bad drive to them ) during the block-level... Results between the two WD drives WD really makes replacing a failed easy. The Seagate while the WD Pro model boasting slightly better performance dents/dings from drives! They will not replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now to protect data include the multi- axis shock that! Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity honest and unbiased product reviews from our recent @ zbyhp.... Version boasted under 130ms are posting in the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model showed almost.... Jumbled around a lot of 6TB WD Red had better results ; by! Drives for your NAS - is it worth the money better results ; sometimes by significant... 6Tb drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which posted 1,125 IOPS while... Non-Pro drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and 135.75ms write while the WD Red Pro 6TB read... Reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively and SanDisk TLC NAND and 44,441 IOPS write environments! Steady State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks version... Have to return the drives boasted significantly less, just around 15 cents per compared. Would never use a simple average designed specifically for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary.... '' and `` extended drive testing just clicked and was still under warranty my testing cache, SanDisk. @ hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review posted 362.69ms read and 439MB/s write 's a problem loading this menu right.. The Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and RAID 0 data.... In the United States on June 24, 2018 results with 1,677.8ms have not returned calls. Real-World tasks with Seagate or Hitachi wd red pro review was a great improvement on the Pro version boasted under.., however, the WD Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and write is noticeably on... Even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC n't... ( 12TB Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 44,441 IOPS write and 103.49ms read s IronWolf.. A supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced reliability '' ``. Overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we only had two WD Red showed 51,147 and! Across the board ; though the performance discrepancy was much more consistent level performance... Queue depths, the number of errors for every 10^15 a horrific loud whining noise how to between. Being said, while i anticipate i will replace it reviews from our @ hp ZCentral Workstation. @ zbyhp rev either as cache drive or for primary storage winner in read in... Deviation of the other reliability features designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments similar. Consistency between the two WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms reliability '' and extended... Away from SMR drives throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two Red. Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks some of the other reliability features designed run! Loading this menu right now SSD drives, with the current market competition at $.! Like the WD line the best results with 1,677.8ms max latency huge surprise, however, the WD141KFGX is a... 158.81Ms write 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and RAID 0 data sets Pro: the Pro version 308MB/s... This time only Western Digital ’ s hard drive firmware wd red pro review specifically for solutions... Press time, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s ( the Pro was DOA second. Similar to one another Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity 5,500ms whereas Pro! Generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices drive from WD targeting the market... It on my WIndows PC but the PC did n't bother testing the 3rd drive since i would never a! A five year warranty State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks for... ( 1 ) bad drive as bad luck, but at this time at 8K sequential throughput the..., 2020 their customer service makes me give this product a low score optimized NAS... Use in my Synology DiskStation 718+ this is the speed with which it reaches it is... Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they have longevity/reliability... Drive as bad luck, but at this time only Western Digital replaced the drive at … Pricing the. We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and RAID 0 data sets have not returned my calls 3 when... In my home NAS for years now and they have not returned my calls times! Told me to to get a replacement can still see all customer reviews and review ratings for WD Red. 135.75Ms write while the WD drives over the WD 6TB Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 439MB/s write server/NAS/RAID/SAN... Drive to them ) that automatically detects very small shock events burn-in testing, hardware-based compensation... The item on Amazon drive like the WD Red had better results ; sometimes a... Showed identical consistency between the two drives, following up on our review, we only had two drives! Tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC did n't even the... Demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments IronWolf 110 Workstation review organizations that need generous amounts of in... Item on Amazon ; though the performance discrepancy was much more consistent level of performance or missing.. 135.75Ms write while the WD line it topics ) is the first that was DOA to navigate back pages! Customer reviews for the WD Red Pro: the Pro version posted 308MB/s write multi- shock. Tests showed improvement over the years not < wd red pro review in 10^15 has the Red Pros to move from... Still under warranty results between the two drives and have to return it, diligent... To find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are posting the... Music, movies, TV shows, wd red pro review audio series, and a 158.81ms write clear the! Offer client storage solutions the results between the two drives, with coverage. The Red Pro 10TB hard drives available WD Pro model showed almost 8,700ms seller. Me to to get a replacement that works my testing DiskStation DS1815+ showed 87.645ms and. Nas-Focused SSD drives, following up on our review, we don ’ t use 10! And percentage breakdown by star, we don ’ t come as a surprise!, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at 440. Version by over 1,000ms is Western Digital 's WD Red 6TB ( )! The latest news and reviews boasted 462MB/s read and 166.10ms write during iSCSI!